Skip to main content

The great Chelsea revival




Much has been made recently of Chelsea's change of fortune and recent run of results. A few month's ago, an FA Cup Final, Champions League Final and a top four position was unthinkable.


The team was seen as dysfunctional with ageing superstars calling the shots and unwilling to play for their new manager.


Villas Boas looked like a man who wished he had never taken the call from Abramovich's advisers and had stayed in warm, friendly Portugal.


The Chelsea players were roundly criticised by the media especially everyone's favourite pantomime villain John Terry. Their poor results was seen as justification as age had caught up with them.


Could there be another reason why the players looked like shadows of their former selves?


If you read any "team building for idiots" book it will point out the real reasons why Chelsea players could not rally around their new coach. Any new boss in any field faces many difficulties and Villas Boas was set up to fail from day one.


Unfortunately, it was made clear from the start that Andre had taken the job to oversee "a project". Even the details of that project were made clear. Namely, that Chelsea had become a team of old pro's and needed modernising. Nothing wrong with that, except, all of Chelsea's success this season depended on it's ageing stars performing well.


If you were in the same shoes as Lampard, Terry and Drogba is this a project you could get behind?


No, Villas Boas had made it public that the very people that Chelsea FC could rely on were surplus to requirements. He had failed to identify the team leaders and engage them in the goals for the team. Not only that, he had actively alienated them.


Chelsea, indeed any team, need Evolution not Revolution. The older players had been made the scapegoat even though their revival has been largely down to their efforts.


Contrast this with Di Matteo's stance. He actively engaged those three players that mattered and gave them a cause to get behind. "Let's go out and win football matches. Oh and by the way, I need you guys to win them for me." Classic team management. 


No talk of modernisation, no revolution, and no fear of not being part of "the project"


A football managers job is to harness his resources and get the best from each and everyone. If you don't rate someone then sell them. Make them feel part of and important to the clubs success not a has-been or a problem to be solved.


Chelsea have many such problems and yes they do still need to evolve and look to the future but those three wily old pro's have too much quality, experience and leadership to be disregarded.

Comments

  1. But at somepoint, they ate gonna have to go!

    Avb should have been backed to complete the project.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes and no. He should have been backed but it should never have come out that Jt lamps and drogba were the problem.

      Delete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Coaching For The Brave

Over the years football has become more and more commercial. At its highest levels the game is now so professional and scientific it bears little resemblance to that played just a generation ago. This has brought great benefits for players, supporters and TV audiences around the world. A whole industry has erupted to support the game, spawning Directors of Football, Sports Psychologists, Performance Analysts and even Sleep Advisers. Clubs have poured millions into Elite Academies for those identified as having a chance of reaching the top and reaping the rewards. Young Starlets that graduate from these Centres of Excellence are paid thousands of pounds per week despite never having done anything of merit in the game. Coaches are trained and can't wait to get into the talent factories as a "first step on the rung" to a dream full time job with a club. Kids as young as nine and ten have a Golden ticket dangled in front of them and doting, eager parents hapi...

Futsal and Youth Development

Futsal and Youth Football I've hesitated in writing this for a few months now but after spending sometime mulling the subject over, I thought I'd bite the bullet and suffer the flak that will inevitably find itself my way. Twitter is my University of choice. It's where I find ideas and swap opinions with like minded fellow Football Coaches. It's amazing, I am constantly surprised at the level of resources out there and more importantly the generosity of many of the people I come across. It's also chock full of people determined to see every exchange as a battle that must be won. This is why I've hesitated. For months now I've been engaged in exchanges about Futsal and in particular why it's a great development tool. Throughout these discussions, I've asked one simple question: Why? Now some have taken this innocuous enquiry at face value and tried to explain the reasons why they feel it works so well, some have just trotted well us...

Now THAT's a Rondo!

I've seen a quote that says "The whole of the game is present in Rondos" I'm not sure about this but since discovering them I have come to see them as an important tool for youth development. However, when I talk to other coaches I sometimes get the idea that they are misunderstood.  Opinions tend to vary from " Ah, the secret weapon of Barcelona " to " Piggy in the middle? " I certainly found that lot's of coaches I know use what they call a Rondo as some kind of warm up before sessions or games start and my own 9 year olds saw it as just a bit of fun when I introduced them to it. The problem is, the Rondo is so much more and can be used in many different ways. After asking my players what they thought about Rondos I decided I needed to reintroduce them and highlight their effectiveness in a new way. Below is a description of how I did this in a recent session. We've probably all seen this set up and this 4v2 exercise is how...